The aus study did not detect virus. It detected sequences based on what the Chinese papers claimed was a virus. And it wasn't since they didn't isolate or prove causation. You will ignore both of these issues or fail to comprehend it. Because you're a PhD and you think you know. Just like you assume they (Chinese) did a proper experiment. They didnt. And so we waste our time trying to get through to you and we fail.
Your study depends on the Chinese studies. Those studies were invalid. See I told you ...you assume. You don't question . You don't understand isolation. Show the methodology in the Chinese papers where they "isolated". You can't. You won't. Because it will show your entire career is fraud and we can't have that.
They just want to promote their beliefs, don't care for data, don't care for truth. It's best not to waste any time on them.
I experience enough cognitive dissonance working with the data as it is. I am not ever able to tune into any consensus, which is agonizing, while they celebrate each other for being in agreement about... about others being wrong, amplifying each others' preconceptions unchecked.
Ooohhh, you mean the people that queued a quarter mile to get in the supermarket and fought over toilet paper, then queued again and again to be crooveed tested, then queued again to get jab, and again...
Yes I agree with you, collective insanity.
I usually refer to them as the chicken society. Their daily routine consists of waking up at a specific hour, talk-talk about nothing, eat, eat, eat, poo, poo, poo... ploc an egg,, talk-talk, then go to sleep. They're good for fertilizing the soil, giving eggs, and meat. They don't ask questions. And when we're done with them... just eat them.
If you don't read, you never find.
Isolation, TEM, full sequencing, successful culture and then export of reference Virus was done in Australia.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/first-detected-covid19-case-arrived
"successful culture"
"Isolation"
False and false.
CPE proves nothing
You're lost in abstracts from reality.
The aus study did not detect virus. It detected sequences based on what the Chinese papers claimed was a virus. And it wasn't since they didn't isolate or prove causation. You will ignore both of these issues or fail to comprehend it. Because you're a PhD and you think you know. Just like you assume they (Chinese) did a proper experiment. They didnt. And so we waste our time trying to get through to you and we fail.
Your study depends on the Chinese studies. Those studies were invalid. See I told you ...you assume. You don't question . You don't understand isolation. Show the methodology in the Chinese papers where they "isolated". You can't. You won't. Because it will show your entire career is fraud and we can't have that.
Yes Geoff. That is how they operate.
They just want to promote their beliefs, don't care for data, don't care for truth. It's best not to waste any time on them.
I experience enough cognitive dissonance working with the data as it is. I am not ever able to tune into any consensus, which is agonizing, while they celebrate each other for being in agreement about... about others being wrong, amplifying each others' preconceptions unchecked.
It is nothing less than collective insanity.
"Collective insanity" ?!?
Ooohhh, you mean the people that queued a quarter mile to get in the supermarket and fought over toilet paper, then queued again and again to be crooveed tested, then queued again to get jab, and again...
Yes I agree with you, collective insanity.
I usually refer to them as the chicken society. Their daily routine consists of waking up at a specific hour, talk-talk about nothing, eat, eat, eat, poo, poo, poo... ploc an egg,, talk-talk, then go to sleep. They're good for fertilizing the soil, giving eggs, and meat. They don't ask questions. And when we're done with them... just eat them.
Why don't you get real ??
Don't care for data or truth? You're a dunce. And a liar. Many people have posted data here that you ignored
I agree, "if you don't read, you never find".
Now, may I suggest you put in your reading list "Virus Mania"... Perhaps you as well would find some food for the mind.
Cheers.
See Reference 1 in my article. But of course you might just be an Abusive Bot