Where were these advocates when the vaccines had gained EUA and were gathering momentum for full FDA approval in mid-2021? The evidence for potential harms of its widespread use were RIGHT THERE in plain sight on the Pfizer website. The side effects were posted, filling pages of single spaced text with hundreds listed. The disclaimers on the official site noted there was no claim of efficacy in terms of transmission or acquisition of COV2. One might conclude that the push for inoculation originated with the press who seemed (were told)to ignore all evidence that the world was not experiencing a pandemic. Moreover, I also blame the medical community who for some unexplained reasons did not speak out, first regarding the preposterous asocial restrictions when protocols for handling a novel virus had been established for decades and second for the FDAs mis-application of EUA for the purpose of mass inoculation via mRna vaccines. Further, full FDA approval without long term study results makes a mockery of the entire approval process. The Great Barrington Declaration was too little too late and fell on deaf ears. What is referred to as healthcare has already been consolidated and branded and unbeknownst to many those high profile brands and the captured quasi-government agencies couldn't care less about our health and never will.
Perhaps the MRNA vaccines were a lottery because of the dosing level and that statistically a number of people received either diluted doses or just saline. Is that a possibility? To produce the millions of vaccines needed at the speed they were produced had to be a factor in the situation.
Where were these advocates when the vaccines had gained EUA and were gathering momentum for full FDA approval in mid-2021? The evidence for potential harms of its widespread use were RIGHT THERE in plain sight on the Pfizer website. The side effects were posted, filling pages of single spaced text with hundreds listed. The disclaimers on the official site noted there was no claim of efficacy in terms of transmission or acquisition of COV2. One might conclude that the push for inoculation originated with the press who seemed (were told)to ignore all evidence that the world was not experiencing a pandemic. Moreover, I also blame the medical community who for some unexplained reasons did not speak out, first regarding the preposterous asocial restrictions when protocols for handling a novel virus had been established for decades and second for the FDAs mis-application of EUA for the purpose of mass inoculation via mRna vaccines. Further, full FDA approval without long term study results makes a mockery of the entire approval process. The Great Barrington Declaration was too little too late and fell on deaf ears. What is referred to as healthcare has already been consolidated and branded and unbeknownst to many those high profile brands and the captured quasi-government agencies couldn't care less about our health and never will.
Thank you for having the courage and integrity to call out the massive harms caused by the so called mRNA vaccines.
Perhaps the MRNA vaccines were a lottery because of the dosing level and that statistically a number of people received either diluted doses or just saline. Is that a possibility? To produce the millions of vaccines needed at the speed they were produced had to be a factor in the situation.
You write in your subtitel: "A coalition of Nordic & Baltic countries & UK". Maybe "from" would be more appropriate. ;)