I think there was complete indifference to the effects of what this biological experiment would do to the masses, after all it was an experiment! They tweaked it in the hope of reducing immediate damage as much as possible, as for the intermediate and longterm effect it matters not to the scientists involved in the experiment because the bad effects of the injection can easily be lost in the loud noise of illness and chronic disease. The top of the tree corrupt scientists lay down the law and the lower order scientists follow their orders and as always the masses pay the penalty.
The Daily Beagle have carefully constructed systematic evidence over a number of articles that they knew exactly what they were doing beginning to end.
Let us take, for example, Pfizer.
Pfizer:
1) Wanted immunity from fraud in their contracts they tried to strongarm Brazil into agreeing
2) Purposefully excluded clinical test subjects that were not beneficial to their narrative (Pfizer's "watermelon" racist remarks; the claims deaths were 'not related' but failing to specify cause; refusing to document serious harms from participants by restricting what they could report)
3) Explicitly picking a known gene modification ('gene therapy') manufacturer AGC Biologics, who are known for producing plasmid DNA, to help manufacture the shots
4) Pfizer's own CEO Albert Bourla making intentionally false statements to the FDA (claiming the EMA wanted approval faster when the EMA never said this)
5) Pfizer's +$22 million lobbying campaign across both major US political parties for the whole of 2020 making it come in the top 50 lobbyist companies (out of thousands), more lobbying than previous years
6) Albert Bourla selling off his stocks and shares the day the shot was released, at the peak of the manufactured hype
8) Heavy financing of scientists and doctors, plus the pre-existing kickback scheme network as uncovered by CBS in 2015
9) Pfizer having revolving doors with members of the FDA; Scott Gottlieb who sat on Pfizer's Board of Directors
10) Pfizer having members of the media; James C Smith, formerly of Thomsom Reuters; Reuters who spent an awful lot of time "factchecking" any criticisms of the shots
11) Even more clinical trial data fraud post-2020 (Brook Jackson whistleblower reports)
12) Albert Bourla verbally sanctioned by the UK for spreading lies about benefits in regards to children
13) Health Regulators co-conspiring to keep harms under wraps by avoiding a formal Article 5(2) Unforeseen Variations declaration by the EMA by having EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides make manual phone calls: Stella Kyriakides received a lump sum worth several million euros via her Greek bank shortly afterwards and refuses to disclose where she got the money from.
14) Albert Bourla's personal text messages with Ursula von der Leyen agreeing terms for a contract in secret, solo, with zero oversight, of which Ursula von der Leyen refused to comply with demands by EU Comission on disclosing.
15) Pfizer hiring social media influencers to shill their products whilst withholding inserts.
16) The withholding of medical inserts by pharmacists showing the harms (E.G. myocarditis)
17) The refusal of the revolving door FDA to withdraw the product given the major harms to children which they themselves acknowledge is a thing
18) HealthCanada admit to plasmids being in the shots, and, key phrasing here - saying they *always knew* - but they don't care
19) British Medical Journal raising the alarm to numerous health regulators based on the EMA leaks (MHRA, Health Canada, EMA, FDA) who all refused to disclose information, who all refused to investigate, and all refused to warn the public.
20) The financing of Paxton's impeachment hearing by bribed politicians three weeks after he announced an investigation into vaccine manufacturers (Paxton goes on record with Tucker Carlson to say he believes it was in response to his investigation of vaccine manufacturers)
Do we need any more damning evidence they know exactly what they are doing?
It infuriates me the public keep mindlessly parroting the lie that evil people are "inept" or "incompetent".
That is exactly what evil men would have you think, because thinking them as being evil men would mean you'd intervene to stop their plans. If you think of them as inept or incompetent, you presume it to be unplanned and without malice and won't intervene.
I will shout this: DO NOT ATTRIBUTE TO INCOMPETENCE WHAT IS MALICE
I think there was complete indifference to the effects of what this biological experiment would do to the masses, after all it was an experiment! They tweaked it in the hope of reducing immediate damage as much as possible, as for the intermediate and longterm effect it matters not to the scientists involved in the experiment because the bad effects of the injection can easily be lost in the loud noise of illness and chronic disease. The top of the tree corrupt scientists lay down the law and the lower order scientists follow their orders and as always the masses pay the penalty.
It is not coincidence nor accident.
The Daily Beagle have carefully constructed systematic evidence over a number of articles that they knew exactly what they were doing beginning to end.
Let us take, for example, Pfizer.
Pfizer:
1) Wanted immunity from fraud in their contracts they tried to strongarm Brazil into agreeing
2) Purposefully excluded clinical test subjects that were not beneficial to their narrative (Pfizer's "watermelon" racist remarks; the claims deaths were 'not related' but failing to specify cause; refusing to document serious harms from participants by restricting what they could report)
3) Explicitly picking a known gene modification ('gene therapy') manufacturer AGC Biologics, who are known for producing plasmid DNA, to help manufacture the shots
4) Pfizer's own CEO Albert Bourla making intentionally false statements to the FDA (claiming the EMA wanted approval faster when the EMA never said this)
5) Pfizer's +$22 million lobbying campaign across both major US political parties for the whole of 2020 making it come in the top 50 lobbyist companies (out of thousands), more lobbying than previous years
6) Albert Bourla selling off his stocks and shares the day the shot was released, at the peak of the manufactured hype
7) Mass sponsorship campaigns of media by Pfizer (see near the end of the propaganda.exe video: https://rumble.com/v283u93-p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a-.-e-x-e.html where you get 'sponsored by Pfizer') to ensure favourable coverage
8) Heavy financing of scientists and doctors, plus the pre-existing kickback scheme network as uncovered by CBS in 2015
9) Pfizer having revolving doors with members of the FDA; Scott Gottlieb who sat on Pfizer's Board of Directors
10) Pfizer having members of the media; James C Smith, formerly of Thomsom Reuters; Reuters who spent an awful lot of time "factchecking" any criticisms of the shots
11) Even more clinical trial data fraud post-2020 (Brook Jackson whistleblower reports)
12) Albert Bourla verbally sanctioned by the UK for spreading lies about benefits in regards to children
13) Health Regulators co-conspiring to keep harms under wraps by avoiding a formal Article 5(2) Unforeseen Variations declaration by the EMA by having EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides make manual phone calls: Stella Kyriakides received a lump sum worth several million euros via her Greek bank shortly afterwards and refuses to disclose where she got the money from.
14) Albert Bourla's personal text messages with Ursula von der Leyen agreeing terms for a contract in secret, solo, with zero oversight, of which Ursula von der Leyen refused to comply with demands by EU Comission on disclosing.
15) Pfizer hiring social media influencers to shill their products whilst withholding inserts.
16) The withholding of medical inserts by pharmacists showing the harms (E.G. myocarditis)
17) The refusal of the revolving door FDA to withdraw the product given the major harms to children which they themselves acknowledge is a thing
18) HealthCanada admit to plasmids being in the shots, and, key phrasing here - saying they *always knew* - but they don't care
19) British Medical Journal raising the alarm to numerous health regulators based on the EMA leaks (MHRA, Health Canada, EMA, FDA) who all refused to disclose information, who all refused to investigate, and all refused to warn the public.
20) The financing of Paxton's impeachment hearing by bribed politicians three weeks after he announced an investigation into vaccine manufacturers (Paxton goes on record with Tucker Carlson to say he believes it was in response to his investigation of vaccine manufacturers)
Do we need any more damning evidence they know exactly what they are doing?
It infuriates me the public keep mindlessly parroting the lie that evil people are "inept" or "incompetent".
That is exactly what evil men would have you think, because thinking them as being evil men would mean you'd intervene to stop their plans. If you think of them as inept or incompetent, you presume it to be unplanned and without malice and won't intervene.
I will shout this: DO NOT ATTRIBUTE TO INCOMPETENCE WHAT IS MALICE
All Vaxxers have damaged immune systems. Every single one.
Now all it will take is for a lab made pathogen to be released that exploits this damage... and kills 6 billion Vaxxers (then we starve)