DNA contaminants - an 'accident' too far?
How many coincidences are believable?
Kevin McKernan’s demonstration of high levels of DNA in the vaccine vials has now been replicated by six other laboratories globally. There are strict limits placed on the amount of DNA allowed because of the risk of this foreign DNA integrating into the human genome. Oddly the EMA limits the amount as a ratio with how much mRNA is present rather than giving an absolute amount. These higher levels were exceeded by 20-30 times.
The vaccine mRNA was manufactured by vats of bacteria to make a template of DNA in order to mass produce the mRNA. It was this DNA template that should have been removed during purification steps that was present in the vials.
Cancer genomics expert, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults was one of the scientists to replicate the measurements and expressed huge concerns about how the DNA was in an optimal state for integration into the human genome. It was not circular, as in the original plasmid, but in linear lengths. Furthermore, each strand would have a similar chance of integration but the DNA present was hugely fragmented such that one strand might have broken down into 100 fragments increasing the risk of integration by 100 fold.
This alone would be a reason to call out the competence of those responsible for making the products and every regulator globally. However, the story gets much worse. There are four other ways in which this DNA was optimised for nuclear integration. This is not about spike DNA being integrated into the cell's DNA. It is about any foreign DNA doing so as there is a risk of it nullifying a gene that controls cell growth and this is a cancer risk.
The SV40 Nuclear Localisation Signal
A nuclear localisation signal is part of a protein that makes a beeline for the nucleus and can drag with it any associated DNA. When designing this platform as gene therapy it was essential that the delivery system ensured DNA would reach the nucleus. One of the methods reported to achieve that was to use the very same SV40 nuclear localisation signal that was found in the vaccine DNA. HART has written about this nuclear localisation signal before. It should not have been in the DNA template and its presence was not disclosed to regulators.
The furin cleavage site Nuclear Localisation Signal
The Furin Cleavage Site, described as highly toxic, was retained in the vaccine sequence, and this sequence is also suggested to be a Nuclear Localisation sequence. One of the arguments for a zoonotic origin was that one of the amino acids in this part of the sequence would not be optimal for human cellular infection. However, it is the presence of this amino acid that gives this region a second function - that of being a second nuclear localisation signal capable to dragging DNA into the nucleus.
The PolyA Nuclear Localisation Signal
In order to stabilise mRNA a series of A nucleotides were added on to the end of the spike sequence. These should not be translated into protein as there is a message to stop translating that precedes it. However, the DNA sequence shows that hidden in this string of As is a start translating message that should not be there. The peptide that would be produced from translating this region would act as a third nuclear localisation signal. The Japanese Regulators evaluation seems to indicate that they noticed this anomaly, saying, the mass produced version of the product “showed a slight difference in the content of poly (A) tail,” but did nothing about it.
Lipid Nanoparticles
As if these concerns were not enough there is the additional problem of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system which was originally designed for gene therapy and therefore their ability to carry material to the nucleus. Not all lipid nanoparticles have the same propensity to do this and some are better suited to carrying RNA rather than DNA. We are not claiming that the one chosen was optimised for nuclear integration but it is a further risk factor.
Indeed the Australian Regulator published images which clearly showed that the S1 portion of the spike was present inside the nucleus in cells in culture when vaccine mRNA was inserted into their cytoplasm. (The bright green area is the golgi apparatus outside the nucleus. The nucleus should not be green at all (see control image below). The dark area within the nucleus that is not green is the nucleolus and it did not penetrate there).
The presence of foreign DNA in the genome can cause various complications, with cancer being the most notable risk. This cancer risk arises from the potential of the foreign DNA to disrupt the genes that prevent uncontrolled growth and control correct any mutations in the DNA. There is also a potential risk of integrating into the genome of sperm and egg cells and impacting on the health of future generations.
With the identification of five separate means of optimising for DNA integration which have not been picked up by any regulators globally, questions must be asked about whether it is a stretch too far to ascribe all of these issues to carelessness or incompetence. How many careless mistakes can be excused?
I think there was complete indifference to the effects of what this biological experiment would do to the masses, after all it was an experiment! They tweaked it in the hope of reducing immediate damage as much as possible, as for the intermediate and longterm effect it matters not to the scientists involved in the experiment because the bad effects of the injection can easily be lost in the loud noise of illness and chronic disease. The top of the tree corrupt scientists lay down the law and the lower order scientists follow their orders and as always the masses pay the penalty.
It is not coincidence nor accident.
The Daily Beagle have carefully constructed systematic evidence over a number of articles that they knew exactly what they were doing beginning to end.
Let us take, for example, Pfizer.
Pfizer:
1) Wanted immunity from fraud in their contracts they tried to strongarm Brazil into agreeing
2) Purposefully excluded clinical test subjects that were not beneficial to their narrative (Pfizer's "watermelon" racist remarks; the claims deaths were 'not related' but failing to specify cause; refusing to document serious harms from participants by restricting what they could report)
3) Explicitly picking a known gene modification ('gene therapy') manufacturer AGC Biologics, who are known for producing plasmid DNA, to help manufacture the shots
4) Pfizer's own CEO Albert Bourla making intentionally false statements to the FDA (claiming the EMA wanted approval faster when the EMA never said this)
5) Pfizer's +$22 million lobbying campaign across both major US political parties for the whole of 2020 making it come in the top 50 lobbyist companies (out of thousands), more lobbying than previous years
6) Albert Bourla selling off his stocks and shares the day the shot was released, at the peak of the manufactured hype
7) Mass sponsorship campaigns of media by Pfizer (see near the end of the propaganda.exe video: https://rumble.com/v283u93-p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a-.-e-x-e.html where you get 'sponsored by Pfizer') to ensure favourable coverage
8) Heavy financing of scientists and doctors, plus the pre-existing kickback scheme network as uncovered by CBS in 2015
9) Pfizer having revolving doors with members of the FDA; Scott Gottlieb who sat on Pfizer's Board of Directors
10) Pfizer having members of the media; James C Smith, formerly of Thomsom Reuters; Reuters who spent an awful lot of time "factchecking" any criticisms of the shots
11) Even more clinical trial data fraud post-2020 (Brook Jackson whistleblower reports)
12) Albert Bourla verbally sanctioned by the UK for spreading lies about benefits in regards to children
13) Health Regulators co-conspiring to keep harms under wraps by avoiding a formal Article 5(2) Unforeseen Variations declaration by the EMA by having EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides make manual phone calls: Stella Kyriakides received a lump sum worth several million euros via her Greek bank shortly afterwards and refuses to disclose where she got the money from.
14) Albert Bourla's personal text messages with Ursula von der Leyen agreeing terms for a contract in secret, solo, with zero oversight, of which Ursula von der Leyen refused to comply with demands by EU Comission on disclosing.
15) Pfizer hiring social media influencers to shill their products whilst withholding inserts.
16) The withholding of medical inserts by pharmacists showing the harms (E.G. myocarditis)
17) The refusal of the revolving door FDA to withdraw the product given the major harms to children which they themselves acknowledge is a thing
18) HealthCanada admit to plasmids being in the shots, and, key phrasing here - saying they *always knew* - but they don't care
19) British Medical Journal raising the alarm to numerous health regulators based on the EMA leaks (MHRA, Health Canada, EMA, FDA) who all refused to disclose information, who all refused to investigate, and all refused to warn the public.
20) The financing of Paxton's impeachment hearing by bribed politicians three weeks after he announced an investigation into vaccine manufacturers (Paxton goes on record with Tucker Carlson to say he believes it was in response to his investigation of vaccine manufacturers)
Do we need any more damning evidence they know exactly what they are doing?
It infuriates me the public keep mindlessly parroting the lie that evil people are "inept" or "incompetent".
That is exactly what evil men would have you think, because thinking them as being evil men would mean you'd intervene to stop their plans. If you think of them as inept or incompetent, you presume it to be unplanned and without malice and won't intervene.
I will shout this: DO NOT ATTRIBUTE TO INCOMPETENCE WHAT IS MALICE