Thanks for this. Better late than never. Ultimately in light of such evidence how can anyone not question the existence of a killer novel virus generating excess deaths? That should be the real question going forward given it is now admitted those that suffered from '''the most extreme form of punishment'' (Simon Crabb solicitor for CHRS) namely elderly dementia patients also died the most 'involving COVID-19' and very often (as during lockdown-1) without any 'testing' in place.
‘'The RESTRICTIONS faced by care home residents, in particular the lack of meaningful contact with loved ones, caused significant mental and physical distress, and is likely to have contributed in a number of cases to cognitive and emotional decline..…and even death.''
''The Inquiry also heard evidence that care home residents received inadequate medical care, ranging from GP services to more serious therapies and treatments, and were even refused admission to hospital.’'
NB: Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR are CONFIRMED as breached by CHRS.
None of this has been reported by ANY media in the world.
All of our human rights were obliterated in 2020 in the name of a virus that was declared a "pandemic", that name gave our "authorities" permission to strip us of our rights to live free independent lives. All of it was a travesty regardless if there was a virus or not, the draconian measures caused most of the damage and like always the vulnerable who are mostly the silent ones in a society are very easy targets. The covid response by our governments was the greatest killer and by calling it a pandemic we are perpetuating the lies.
Indeed.....how is it that this viral flu-like illness brought forth tyrannical measures in 2020 when every previous outbreak ( occurring seasonally) didn't. [Rhetorical question] The labelling was deliberate....'pandemic'....'Covid-19'....so the whole gamut of government's destructive diktats could be unleashed. It had to be made a 'special' virus, a 'novel' one so that people could 'take it to heart'. It was very cruel to play people like that.
This Scottish report touches on a few well known aspects of a very pervasive crime spree. One thing that needs to be addressed in the conclusions of this report, is the widespread nature of the same story again and again. What was going on in Scotland was going on in many other settings. The larger picture and the underlying whys are usually neglected. Why the unwillingness to look at whys? Because the news is so devastating! There are many local repeats of this same assessment emanating from many locales including Canada, where I live.
To me it seems pretty obvious that helping along the deaths of so many in nursing homes helped fire up the concocted impression that a terrible plague had spontaneously arisen among us. Later it became clear that news of "the rising case numbers" in the general population were based on the fiction that the PCR tests worked.
The all-cause-mortality rates did not come until late 2021 when we began to obtain news about how the mass jabbing (with bioweapons disguised as vaccines) was affecting the entire population. So the resort to murdering people in old folks homes was part of a preplanned theatrical drama designed to help herd the public into taking the jabs. The purpose was not to create a remedy for a respiratory virus but to depopulate us and prepare the survivors for transhumanist enslavement through genetic modification, bio-digital insertions etc etc. To this day we still have not been given an honest account of what was and is being done to us.
This interpretation needs to be forced into circulation to give humanity a chance to survive the unspeakable crimes to which we are still being subjected, oftentimes on the rationale of various forms of fake global warming lockdowns. Ladies and gentlemen, this whole nightmare that is still being imposed on us, is on purpose. Its not mere incompetence or negligence at work here. Deal with it in Scotland and everywhere else too.
I'm becoming aware of a massive trend in cutting off the COVIDIAN investigations before the arbiters get to the most important elements of what is really going on in our midst. For the most part universities have been conspicuous in their absence from significant roles in genuine remedial processes.
Doctors who face a firing line of bureaucrats issuing guidance that runs counter to ethical treatment need to refuse to implement what is so blatantly inhumane. Soldiers who are given unethical orders are obligated by law to REFUSE THOSE ORDERS. Look no further than the soldiers who opened fire on innocents in My Lai Vietnam who had followed unlawful orders in the killing of at least 347 unarmed civilians. 22 of them were charged with criminal offenses. I think doctors are also sworn to a code of ethics the violation of which carries a penalty. Is the not correct?
Re: “Doctors who face a firing line of bureaucrats issuing guidance that runs counter to ethical treatment need to refuse to implement what is so blatantly inhumane.”
Exactly.
Doctors, nurses and pharmacists should have refused to collaborate with coercion and vaccine mandates.
But they went along with it, ‘just following orders’ as agents of the state.
All credit to the Scottish inquiry that it at least acknowledged this shameful behaviour has taken place since no other country has admitted doing the same. However, there seems no reason to think the developed counties did any different given the fact that most people who died were elderly and many, if not most, were in care homes because of dementia!
Scotland has a robust legal framework which should have been used to protect care home residents, the majority of whom have a diagnosis of dementia or some other cognitive or sensory impairment. The Coronavirus Act 2020 changed or suspended many safeguards, particularly in relation to the role of attorneys and guardians. However, the Adult Support & Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 (ASP Act), which has a similar but possibly more robust function and infrastructure than the Care Act 2014 in England, was unaffected. Indeed, the ASP Act was enhanced with an amendment to recognise that covid infection could create a new situation of risk for adults.
Each of Scotland’s 32 Local Authorities has a multi disciplinary Adult Protection Committee which oversees the functioning of the Act and these committees are overseen but a National Strategic Forum hosted by the Scottish Government. This robust infrastructure gives priority to adult protection and ensures that all health and social care staff are aware of their responsibility to recognise and report harm of which there is no threshold and absolutely no exemptions. Reporting all harms, irrespective of personal bias, is essential to recognise patterns of harm which could be happening on a larger scale. See something, say something is the national slogan to protect adults who could be at risk of harm.
The Scottish Government and Scottish health and social care organisations were informed on numerous occasions about actual and potential harms to care home residents but, as far as I’m aware, none have been recognised as harm under the Act which prompts a duty on Local Authorities to make further inquires.
Regardless of individual opinion on the necessity of the interventions that were imposed on care homes, the health and social care workforce should have been encouraged to report harm as they saw it happening. Had this been done, the atrocities as documented here could and should have been avoided.
Thanks for this. Better late than never. Ultimately in light of such evidence how can anyone not question the existence of a killer novel virus generating excess deaths? That should be the real question going forward given it is now admitted those that suffered from '''the most extreme form of punishment'' (Simon Crabb solicitor for CHRS) namely elderly dementia patients also died the most 'involving COVID-19' and very often (as during lockdown-1) without any 'testing' in place.
‘'The RESTRICTIONS faced by care home residents, in particular the lack of meaningful contact with loved ones, caused significant mental and physical distress, and is likely to have contributed in a number of cases to cognitive and emotional decline..…and even death.''
''The Inquiry also heard evidence that care home residents received inadequate medical care, ranging from GP services to more serious therapies and treatments, and were even refused admission to hospital.’'
NB: Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR are CONFIRMED as breached by CHRS.
None of this has been reported by ANY media in the world.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/breakingscottish-covid-inquiry-closing-ea4
All of our human rights were obliterated in 2020 in the name of a virus that was declared a "pandemic", that name gave our "authorities" permission to strip us of our rights to live free independent lives. All of it was a travesty regardless if there was a virus or not, the draconian measures caused most of the damage and like always the vulnerable who are mostly the silent ones in a society are very easy targets. The covid response by our governments was the greatest killer and by calling it a pandemic we are perpetuating the lies.
Indeed.....how is it that this viral flu-like illness brought forth tyrannical measures in 2020 when every previous outbreak ( occurring seasonally) didn't. [Rhetorical question] The labelling was deliberate....'pandemic'....'Covid-19'....so the whole gamut of government's destructive diktats could be unleashed. It had to be made a 'special' virus, a 'novel' one so that people could 'take it to heart'. It was very cruel to play people like that.
This Scottish report touches on a few well known aspects of a very pervasive crime spree. One thing that needs to be addressed in the conclusions of this report, is the widespread nature of the same story again and again. What was going on in Scotland was going on in many other settings. The larger picture and the underlying whys are usually neglected. Why the unwillingness to look at whys? Because the news is so devastating! There are many local repeats of this same assessment emanating from many locales including Canada, where I live.
To me it seems pretty obvious that helping along the deaths of so many in nursing homes helped fire up the concocted impression that a terrible plague had spontaneously arisen among us. Later it became clear that news of "the rising case numbers" in the general population were based on the fiction that the PCR tests worked.
The all-cause-mortality rates did not come until late 2021 when we began to obtain news about how the mass jabbing (with bioweapons disguised as vaccines) was affecting the entire population. So the resort to murdering people in old folks homes was part of a preplanned theatrical drama designed to help herd the public into taking the jabs. The purpose was not to create a remedy for a respiratory virus but to depopulate us and prepare the survivors for transhumanist enslavement through genetic modification, bio-digital insertions etc etc. To this day we still have not been given an honest account of what was and is being done to us.
This interpretation needs to be forced into circulation to give humanity a chance to survive the unspeakable crimes to which we are still being subjected, oftentimes on the rationale of various forms of fake global warming lockdowns. Ladies and gentlemen, this whole nightmare that is still being imposed on us, is on purpose. Its not mere incompetence or negligence at work here. Deal with it in Scotland and everywhere else too.
I'm becoming aware of a massive trend in cutting off the COVIDIAN investigations before the arbiters get to the most important elements of what is really going on in our midst. For the most part universities have been conspicuous in their absence from significant roles in genuine remedial processes.
Tony Hall
Emeritus Professor
University of Lethbridge
Doctors who face a firing line of bureaucrats issuing guidance that runs counter to ethical treatment need to refuse to implement what is so blatantly inhumane. Soldiers who are given unethical orders are obligated by law to REFUSE THOSE ORDERS. Look no further than the soldiers who opened fire on innocents in My Lai Vietnam who had followed unlawful orders in the killing of at least 347 unarmed civilians. 22 of them were charged with criminal offenses. I think doctors are also sworn to a code of ethics the violation of which carries a penalty. Is the not correct?
Re: “Doctors who face a firing line of bureaucrats issuing guidance that runs counter to ethical treatment need to refuse to implement what is so blatantly inhumane.”
Exactly.
Doctors, nurses and pharmacists should have refused to collaborate with coercion and vaccine mandates.
But they went along with it, ‘just following orders’ as agents of the state.
See: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/just-following-orders
All credit to the Scottish inquiry that it at least acknowledged this shameful behaviour has taken place since no other country has admitted doing the same. However, there seems no reason to think the developed counties did any different given the fact that most people who died were elderly and many, if not most, were in care homes because of dementia!
Scotland has a robust legal framework which should have been used to protect care home residents, the majority of whom have a diagnosis of dementia or some other cognitive or sensory impairment. The Coronavirus Act 2020 changed or suspended many safeguards, particularly in relation to the role of attorneys and guardians. However, the Adult Support & Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 (ASP Act), which has a similar but possibly more robust function and infrastructure than the Care Act 2014 in England, was unaffected. Indeed, the ASP Act was enhanced with an amendment to recognise that covid infection could create a new situation of risk for adults.
Each of Scotland’s 32 Local Authorities has a multi disciplinary Adult Protection Committee which oversees the functioning of the Act and these committees are overseen but a National Strategic Forum hosted by the Scottish Government. This robust infrastructure gives priority to adult protection and ensures that all health and social care staff are aware of their responsibility to recognise and report harm of which there is no threshold and absolutely no exemptions. Reporting all harms, irrespective of personal bias, is essential to recognise patterns of harm which could be happening on a larger scale. See something, say something is the national slogan to protect adults who could be at risk of harm.
The Scottish Government and Scottish health and social care organisations were informed on numerous occasions about actual and potential harms to care home residents but, as far as I’m aware, none have been recognised as harm under the Act which prompts a duty on Local Authorities to make further inquires.
Regardless of individual opinion on the necessity of the interventions that were imposed on care homes, the health and social care workforce should have been encouraged to report harm as they saw it happening. Had this been done, the atrocities as documented here could and should have been avoided.