Re your very relevant comment that given Sajid Javvid’s enthusiasm for the public to be vaccinated, one might think had also received a dose or two himself, it would be very interesting to know how many of the vaccines and boosters he has received and whether he continues to be boosted or if his enthusiasm has waned...
In Mr. Kieth's response to Chriton above he says: "....they feel that their loved one's death may have been prevented if the MHRA had been more public sooner.” Here I'd like to note the use of the words "feel" and "may" which soften the blow to the safety narrative.( by contrast substitute "know" and "would" instead) If the narrative bound cabal is going to continue to obfuscate matters without being immediately called on it then what is the point of hearings?
Secondly, and this is an old saw, which I believe is worth repeating, ALL DOCTORS involved in perpetrating the COV2 madness should be ashamed of their complicity. And, I'm a little surprised we've not heard from those doctors in the form of DIRECT and public APOLOGIES or at least a simple expression of REGRET for their actions. If someone knows of any such statements en masse or from individuals please direct me there.
If a patient expected their physicians to be an interface between themselves and an administrator then why would they bother with a doctor at all? Why not accept a diagnosis or prescription or injection from their insurance company, or their governor for that matter? It seems to me that consultation via telehealth was a form of this ridiculous proposition. Most stunningly, here in NH USA we had the NATIONAL GUARD administering doses!
Alot of the more crucial statement evidence is routinely missed by lawyers (even in Scotland) which allows for the misplaced 'alt' view of ''whitewash'' i don't believe that's true when you take the time to read the actual statements. The evidence is there but almost no one is looking.
These are excellent write-up's over THREE CHAPTERS (with more to come) yet i am left wondering if only there was the same focus and attention to detail by HART members and other critics as to what has been CONFIRMED officially in Scotland (7 months ago) https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing and also now in part even in England.
‘‘I believe visiting guidance across Hospitals and Social Care amounted to abuse (Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) under Article 3 of the ECHR. The Social Care institute for Excellence (SUE) recognises different types of psychological and emotional abuse: 'enforced social isolation',’failure to respect privacy’,’preventing stimulation..." etc. SCIE also state different types of organisational or institutional abuse: "discouraging visits or the involvement of relatives or friends","lack of respect for dignity and privacy.’’
-Paragraph 63(h)
‘‘Where laws are infringed, including fundamental human rights that protect life or prohibit treatment that is inhumane or degrading, there should be mechanisms in place to identify and hold those responsible to account, even in an epidemic, pandemic or healthcare emergency situation. This includes not just the individuals who have infringed these laws, but also those in supervisory roles who have permitted this to occur.''
-Paragraph 63(k)
Namely the egregious lockdown harms inflicted upon care home residents who had their human rights removed and more for the best part of 18 months. This is NOT denied. COVID 'vaccine' discussions are still very important but the care homes evidence reveals the root of the COVID story and for whatever reason no one 'speaking out' really wants to 'talk' about it on the same consistent basis if at all. This will be documented too for future generations.
It’s all a white wash. Most of the arguments in favor of what the Government did are based on the ultimate false assumption that the “vaccines” are safe and effective. They were neither. The Manufacturers and the Government should have taken pains to make sure the “vaccines” were safe. They did not.
Yes, of course it's a whitewash as well as a coverup but then aren't all government 'inquiries' pretty much of a whitewash? More importantly perhaps is what happens after the inquiry? Even the much vaunted 'inquiry' into the Post Office scandal, the great majority of victims still have no redress to the crimes committed by the state. Talk is cheap, except these 'inquiries' cost millions of public money. What a farce!
How can they lie so brazenly. The comments about the study which found the incidence of myocarditis to be 97 in the vaccine arm and 16 in the positive covid test arm for men under 40 just beggars belief.
Is it cognitive dissonance? They just can’t take in the truth, their faith in the contrary being so great…
Re your very relevant comment that given Sajid Javvid’s enthusiasm for the public to be vaccinated, one might think had also received a dose or two himself, it would be very interesting to know how many of the vaccines and boosters he has received and whether he continues to be boosted or if his enthusiasm has waned...
Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer to that question.
In Mr. Kieth's response to Chriton above he says: "....they feel that their loved one's death may have been prevented if the MHRA had been more public sooner.” Here I'd like to note the use of the words "feel" and "may" which soften the blow to the safety narrative.( by contrast substitute "know" and "would" instead) If the narrative bound cabal is going to continue to obfuscate matters without being immediately called on it then what is the point of hearings?
Secondly, and this is an old saw, which I believe is worth repeating, ALL DOCTORS involved in perpetrating the COV2 madness should be ashamed of their complicity. And, I'm a little surprised we've not heard from those doctors in the form of DIRECT and public APOLOGIES or at least a simple expression of REGRET for their actions. If someone knows of any such statements en masse or from individuals please direct me there.
If a patient expected their physicians to be an interface between themselves and an administrator then why would they bother with a doctor at all? Why not accept a diagnosis or prescription or injection from their insurance company, or their governor for that matter? It seems to me that consultation via telehealth was a form of this ridiculous proposition. Most stunningly, here in NH USA we had the NATIONAL GUARD administering doses!
Alot of the more crucial statement evidence is routinely missed by lawyers (even in Scotland) which allows for the misplaced 'alt' view of ''whitewash'' i don't believe that's true when you take the time to read the actual statements. The evidence is there but almost no one is looking.
These are excellent write-up's over THREE CHAPTERS (with more to come) yet i am left wondering if only there was the same focus and attention to detail by HART members and other critics as to what has been CONFIRMED officially in Scotland (7 months ago) https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing and also now in part even in England.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-26-nov-2024-260?utm_source=publication-search
‘‘I believe visiting guidance across Hospitals and Social Care amounted to abuse (Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) under Article 3 of the ECHR. The Social Care institute for Excellence (SUE) recognises different types of psychological and emotional abuse: 'enforced social isolation',’failure to respect privacy’,’preventing stimulation..." etc. SCIE also state different types of organisational or institutional abuse: "discouraging visits or the involvement of relatives or friends","lack of respect for dignity and privacy.’’
-Paragraph 63(h)
‘‘Where laws are infringed, including fundamental human rights that protect life or prohibit treatment that is inhumane or degrading, there should be mechanisms in place to identify and hold those responsible to account, even in an epidemic, pandemic or healthcare emergency situation. This includes not just the individuals who have infringed these laws, but also those in supervisory roles who have permitted this to occur.''
-Paragraph 63(k)
Namely the egregious lockdown harms inflicted upon care home residents who had their human rights removed and more for the best part of 18 months. This is NOT denied. COVID 'vaccine' discussions are still very important but the care homes evidence reveals the root of the COVID story and for whatever reason no one 'speaking out' really wants to 'talk' about it on the same consistent basis if at all. This will be documented too for future generations.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newnever-forget-2025
It’s all a white wash. Most of the arguments in favor of what the Government did are based on the ultimate false assumption that the “vaccines” are safe and effective. They were neither. The Manufacturers and the Government should have taken pains to make sure the “vaccines” were safe. They did not.
Yes, of course it's a whitewash as well as a coverup but then aren't all government 'inquiries' pretty much of a whitewash? More importantly perhaps is what happens after the inquiry? Even the much vaunted 'inquiry' into the Post Office scandal, the great majority of victims still have no redress to the crimes committed by the state. Talk is cheap, except these 'inquiries' cost millions of public money. What a farce!
'What a farce ' I'm not sure Sir Hugo Keith KC (oh sorry, a little premature with the knighthood, but we shall see ) would agree.
Not a surprise but still horrifying to read
How can they lie so brazenly. The comments about the study which found the incidence of myocarditis to be 97 in the vaccine arm and 16 in the positive covid test arm for men under 40 just beggars belief.
Is it cognitive dissonance? They just can’t take in the truth, their faith in the contrary being so great…
What does “and fry to the pandemic” mean???..