You can see that the pharmaceutical industry are looking for any weaknesses that allow them to circumvent rules, laws or ethics which are there to protect us from unlawful experimentation in adults and children alike. They have no morals and do not care about what is right or wrong so will ruthlessly exploit whatever advantage they can get. The end result for them is their product and the amount of money it will make them. They see humans as a means to an end, no matter what damage it may cause on the journey to their goal. Covid injections are the perfect example.
A good post I read recently details how Dr Russell Blaylock MD ( now essentially scrubbed from the web) pulled the rug out completely from the entire herd immunity narrative! (The narrative that justifies the use of ANY vaccine.)
No children should be objects of experiments fur any kind of medication or vaccines. End of, no exceptions. Childhood vaccine programs should be suspended all over the world.
By the time one reaches adolescence, one may have the sophistication to understand the risk benefit analysis involved in informed consent. I don't know whether a minimally trained pharmacy technician who may be the one administering the needles in the private non-clinical setting would be capable of answering questions arising from the client after they have read and evaluated( assuming they are literate) the pertinent literature provided well in advance ( of course) of the shot.
I've taken a look at the potential composition of the PMCPA Code of Practice Panel who seem out of central casting for a movie about revolving doors. The PMCPA director, a certain Alex Fell has a CV that is peppered with words such as strategy, ethics, compliance, risk. all of which were used in the context of employment by big pharma directly or indirectly through consortia. I would speculate that Mr. Fell's studied roles while immersed in the culture of capitalism involved combing the various applicable codes of conduct searching for ways in which the rules could be bent( interpreted) in favor of profit. (As a CPA searches for loopholes). He may retain a similar perspective while adjudicating complaints presented to the panel. I'd like to be wrong about this. One level of truth could obtain from the release of the Panel meeting minutes. Are these made public?
You can see that the pharmaceutical industry are looking for any weaknesses that allow them to circumvent rules, laws or ethics which are there to protect us from unlawful experimentation in adults and children alike. They have no morals and do not care about what is right or wrong so will ruthlessly exploit whatever advantage they can get. The end result for them is their product and the amount of money it will make them. They see humans as a means to an end, no matter what damage it may cause on the journey to their goal. Covid injections are the perfect example.
So right, Amat! And that’s been happening for decades upon decades, assisted by our willing governments!
Good stuff!
A good post I read recently details how Dr Russell Blaylock MD ( now essentially scrubbed from the web) pulled the rug out completely from the entire herd immunity narrative! (The narrative that justifies the use of ANY vaccine.)
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/vaxx-hoaxes-and-anti-vaxx-myths?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
No children should be objects of experiments fur any kind of medication or vaccines. End of, no exceptions. Childhood vaccine programs should be suspended all over the world.
By the time one reaches adolescence, one may have the sophistication to understand the risk benefit analysis involved in informed consent. I don't know whether a minimally trained pharmacy technician who may be the one administering the needles in the private non-clinical setting would be capable of answering questions arising from the client after they have read and evaluated( assuming they are literate) the pertinent literature provided well in advance ( of course) of the shot.
I've taken a look at the potential composition of the PMCPA Code of Practice Panel who seem out of central casting for a movie about revolving doors. The PMCPA director, a certain Alex Fell has a CV that is peppered with words such as strategy, ethics, compliance, risk. all of which were used in the context of employment by big pharma directly or indirectly through consortia. I would speculate that Mr. Fell's studied roles while immersed in the culture of capitalism involved combing the various applicable codes of conduct searching for ways in which the rules could be bent( interpreted) in favor of profit. (As a CPA searches for loopholes). He may retain a similar perspective while adjudicating complaints presented to the panel. I'd like to be wrong about this. One level of truth could obtain from the release of the Panel meeting minutes. Are these made public?