And if you read books like Dissolving Illusions by Dr Suzanne Humphries you realise exactly the same story repeats over and over of pharmaceutical products causing harm - ordinary people know, a very few dissident doctors and scientists know but the authorities and the manufacturers refuse to listen or admit or even consider that the products are harmful until decades later in many cases.
Yes the MHRA are slow to react to harms caused but with lightening speed they will recommend and push drugs and vaccines by their pharmaceutical buddies.
The MHRA have admitted that they are Big Pharma facilitators, not regulators. No admissions of "vaccine" harms will be forthcoming, that's for sure. Bought and paid for.
Is any of this behaviour surprising when (with the exception of emergency medicine) the entire model of allopathic medicine is ultimately based on disease. There is little money in health.
I could tell you how to prevent and cure multiple sclerosis (just to give one example) relatively easily without a single pharmaceutical.
Does anybody really believe this is something any of the charities, foundations, pharmaceutical companies etc.. would want to know or advertise?
We live in a very sick society where I estimate ~90% of humans are brain damaged.
Could it all be deliberate? Are people avoiding the obvious question and any evidence that may support it? SV40 was developed way back in 1963 as a bioweapon to kill. It is in the so called 'vaccines'. Remdesivir is not a new drug treatment and the destruction of kidneys and kidney function is a long ago known factor in its use yet it became a hospital treatment protocol drug for anyone shown by PCR as positive. Effectively a certainty for anyone as the reference gene sequence used exists it appears in every living man, woman and child, just wind up the Ct. N1-Methyl-psuedouridine is also not entirely a new invention yet it too is in the so called 'vaccine' as a material element in its effectiveness - a performance booster seemingly intended to facilitate insertion of mRNA genetic material directly affecting cell changes many from what is known as Frame Shifting with unknowable and unpredictable outcomes.
It's a reach for me to suspect that the people who spoke out early (Kulldorff, Ioannidis, Bhattacharya, etc.) have a conflict in favour of vaccines), or a bias from any influence to 'look away' from any data showing causality of excess deaths to the vaccines. Ioannidis gave a talk that reevaluated the Austin Hill criteria in light of accumulated research since then (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.6825). I don't see how the dose-response criteria (for one) has been met by any data. I'm not doubting the association, but (as Henneghan argued long ago), there needs to be triangulation of deaths to reveal more about causality. Not there currently, I don't think.
Based on my Trust the Evidence learning, there isn't sufficient evidence yet to made a strong causal argument yet. There is a need to delineate what the excess deaths are due to (vaccine injury; mental health decline and related loss of life; poorer health care; failure to go to hospital due to fear of covid or related issue?). I'm not denying it but people smarter than me aren't drawing the conclusion yet; so far the evidence is correlational, no? Thank you.
Excess deaths in mid 2020 and early 2021 correlate with Midazolam purchases and NICE guideline. Analysis shows that all 7 Austin Hill criteria are met which equals "causation" of Iatrogenic deaths. Yellow card and US VAERS reports show various similar adverse events which meets the a couple of the Austin Hill criteria and other data sources that would prove "causation" in the UK are being withheld though data released by a whistle blower in Australia? is evidence of "causation". It may be some smart people are paid not to see.
Carl Heneghan obviously treads very carefully indeed as he could fall foul of the GMC and his employer (I believe) the NHS. I doubt he is rich enough to take a financial hit from suspension, etc.
This affects the whole tone and presentation of TTE, which is a far from satisfactory site.
He always stops short in drawing logical conclusions, but has done much better than Sunetra Guptra who simply sold out and says only the weakest things now about vaccine fatalities and looks uncomfortable.
And if you read books like Dissolving Illusions by Dr Suzanne Humphries you realise exactly the same story repeats over and over of pharmaceutical products causing harm - ordinary people know, a very few dissident doctors and scientists know but the authorities and the manufacturers refuse to listen or admit or even consider that the products are harmful until decades later in many cases.
Yes the MHRA are slow to react to harms caused but with lightening speed they will recommend and push drugs and vaccines by their pharmaceutical buddies.
.
I Wouldn’t Jump To Conclusions
About The Vaccine.
I’d Wait Until They’re All Dead
Just To Be Sure.
.
If they admit the truth, they admit wrong doing and know they are liable and criminals and they won’t.
The MHRA have admitted that they are Big Pharma facilitators, not regulators. No admissions of "vaccine" harms will be forthcoming, that's for sure. Bought and paid for.
I'm stating the obvious here..
Is any of this behaviour surprising when (with the exception of emergency medicine) the entire model of allopathic medicine is ultimately based on disease. There is little money in health.
I could tell you how to prevent and cure multiple sclerosis (just to give one example) relatively easily without a single pharmaceutical.
Does anybody really believe this is something any of the charities, foundations, pharmaceutical companies etc.. would want to know or advertise?
We live in a very sick society where I estimate ~90% of humans are brain damaged.
Big Pharma, Big Money.....MHRA mouse...will refuse to squeak.
Could it all be deliberate? Are people avoiding the obvious question and any evidence that may support it? SV40 was developed way back in 1963 as a bioweapon to kill. It is in the so called 'vaccines'. Remdesivir is not a new drug treatment and the destruction of kidneys and kidney function is a long ago known factor in its use yet it became a hospital treatment protocol drug for anyone shown by PCR as positive. Effectively a certainty for anyone as the reference gene sequence used exists it appears in every living man, woman and child, just wind up the Ct. N1-Methyl-psuedouridine is also not entirely a new invention yet it too is in the so called 'vaccine' as a material element in its effectiveness - a performance booster seemingly intended to facilitate insertion of mRNA genetic material directly affecting cell changes many from what is known as Frame Shifting with unknowable and unpredictable outcomes.
It seems between 2019 and Oct 2023 MHRA received $5,575,188 from the B & MG F and $12.6M in total. Over $1Billion 2019-Oct 23 to UK organisations.
The fox is guarding the hen house.
It's a reach for me to suspect that the people who spoke out early (Kulldorff, Ioannidis, Bhattacharya, etc.) have a conflict in favour of vaccines), or a bias from any influence to 'look away' from any data showing causality of excess deaths to the vaccines. Ioannidis gave a talk that reevaluated the Austin Hill criteria in light of accumulated research since then (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.6825). I don't see how the dose-response criteria (for one) has been met by any data. I'm not doubting the association, but (as Henneghan argued long ago), there needs to be triangulation of deaths to reveal more about causality. Not there currently, I don't think.
Based on my Trust the Evidence learning, there isn't sufficient evidence yet to made a strong causal argument yet. There is a need to delineate what the excess deaths are due to (vaccine injury; mental health decline and related loss of life; poorer health care; failure to go to hospital due to fear of covid or related issue?). I'm not denying it but people smarter than me aren't drawing the conclusion yet; so far the evidence is correlational, no? Thank you.
Excess deaths in mid 2020 and early 2021 correlate with Midazolam purchases and NICE guideline. Analysis shows that all 7 Austin Hill criteria are met which equals "causation" of Iatrogenic deaths. Yellow card and US VAERS reports show various similar adverse events which meets the a couple of the Austin Hill criteria and other data sources that would prove "causation" in the UK are being withheld though data released by a whistle blower in Australia? is evidence of "causation". It may be some smart people are paid not to see.
Carl Heneghan obviously treads very carefully indeed as he could fall foul of the GMC and his employer (I believe) the NHS. I doubt he is rich enough to take a financial hit from suspension, etc.
This affects the whole tone and presentation of TTE, which is a far from satisfactory site.
He always stops short in drawing logical conclusions, but has done much better than Sunetra Guptra who simply sold out and says only the weakest things now about vaccine fatalities and looks uncomfortable.