To be a “Real Scientist” these days, one has to be a politician it seems. Sadly this defeats the true purpose of science, but upholds the agenda of the NWO, et al!
You missed the part where the "scientist" very quickly mentions the shortest probability calculation manageable that contradicts their findings, but then immediately sidewinds onto a completely different probability calculation that confirms their bias, never talking about the first.
Oh yeah, also add: be sure to remove anything the "peer reviewer" requests, like tables and/or graphs showing information that accidentally contradicts the narrative.
To be a “Real Scientist” these days, one has to be a politician it seems. Sadly this defeats the true purpose of science, but upholds the agenda of the NWO, et al!
"talk away any awkward findings"
You missed the part where the "scientist" very quickly mentions the shortest probability calculation manageable that contradicts their findings, but then immediately sidewinds onto a completely different probability calculation that confirms their bias, never talking about the first.
Oh yeah, also add: be sure to remove anything the "peer reviewer" requests, like tables and/or graphs showing information that accidentally contradicts the narrative.
A creative tack on your part.