Thank you for this report. It is immensely concerning, firstly that population-wide experimental medical interventions were made indiscriminately without informed consent, and then secondly that no systematic follow through of the effects was undertaken, or if it was, that its results have been suppressed, especially given the significant deterioration in public health that has occurred.
Such data as exists is not made publicly available but has apparently been passed only to certain Pharma companies.
Pitifully attended short debates are wholly inadequate to deal with the shocking and on-going events of the last four years and make a complete mockery of Parliamentary accountability.
The British people are being failed and their tradition of constitutional government and rule of law lies in ruins.
So few MP prepared to attend these important debates, so many sitting on their consciences, so many devoid of any conscience or scruples. How can those who do speak out continue to speak for, campaign for, their Uniparty? It is supporting those who have no conscience if they stick by them....resign they should to stand shoulder to shoulder with the rest of us who were bullied in to compliance with lockdown diktats, and, for those who were coerced in to having the toxic jabs to keep their jobs. They should resign from their Uniparty and stand as Independents, otherwise they perpetuate the illusion that politicians serve the people.
Of course they wanted to put a needle into every human arm across the globe. Reckless and criminal and so many people lined up for them, again and again and again. Now all authorities are hiding and manipulating the data and they are in control so the truth of this injection frenzy is being buried as deep as possible by them. Trust the science? No, we should always question the science first. There has been too much trust and not enough scepticism.
I'm glad you mentioned that the aetiology is multifactorial and that obesity is a risk factor. When will we stop treating dietary guidelines as sacred scripture that can't be challenged? Years before COVID 19, doctors who questioned the high level of refined carbohydrate officially recommended, were persecuted and even dragged before the courts. We don't understand biochemistry and metabolism. We just keep repeating mantras like 'five a day' and 'saturated (i.e animal) fat is unhealthy'. We ignore the people who could have given us better understanding, but change is on the way, and it's a bottom up change.
The British Government's attempt to address the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in 2020 will eventually be seen in as both extraordinarily inept and amazingly successful. Overall it appears to have caused a significant move of wealth (and undermined the health) in our population.
The media handling of the governent's message was brilliant, with frightening images from China and Italy followed by tentatively introduced personal restrictions, which were gradually increased, the use of masks to spread fear in the population, and the message that only the bad or stupid failed to comply with their Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).
However, if the purpose of these NPIs was to stop the spread of the virus and limit its consequences, they were an abject failure. The IFR was exaggerated, PCR testing mismanaged, quarenteen misused and face covering useless.
The whole thing was unimaginably wasteful. On average, it was the equivalent of a £15,000 gift from government to each UK adult.
Most average people will be paying for this disaster for the rest of their lives. But according to Gary Stevenson (an ex financial trader), a small group of the very rich will accumulate this currency causing wealth inequality to exploded. Much of this new wealth will be spent on acquiring tangible assets and provoke yet another increase in their prices. Average houses will become to expensive for the average person to acquire.
The question in my mind is, was this a terrible "cock up" by the naive and overpromoted who were scared fools goaded on by the greedy; or some kind of ill-conceived conspiracy by shadowy governmental or multinational actors.
I find it more comforting to believe the second option because I prefer to hold on to the belief our authorities are competent even if their motives are questionable. The trouble is though the "cock-up" theory of history is nearly always correct.
Thank you for this report. It is immensely concerning, firstly that population-wide experimental medical interventions were made indiscriminately without informed consent, and then secondly that no systematic follow through of the effects was undertaken, or if it was, that its results have been suppressed, especially given the significant deterioration in public health that has occurred.
Such data as exists is not made publicly available but has apparently been passed only to certain Pharma companies.
Pitifully attended short debates are wholly inadequate to deal with the shocking and on-going events of the last four years and make a complete mockery of Parliamentary accountability.
The British people are being failed and their tradition of constitutional government and rule of law lies in ruins.
So few MP prepared to attend these important debates, so many sitting on their consciences, so many devoid of any conscience or scruples. How can those who do speak out continue to speak for, campaign for, their Uniparty? It is supporting those who have no conscience if they stick by them....resign they should to stand shoulder to shoulder with the rest of us who were bullied in to compliance with lockdown diktats, and, for those who were coerced in to having the toxic jabs to keep their jobs. They should resign from their Uniparty and stand as Independents, otherwise they perpetuate the illusion that politicians serve the people.
Of course they wanted to put a needle into every human arm across the globe. Reckless and criminal and so many people lined up for them, again and again and again. Now all authorities are hiding and manipulating the data and they are in control so the truth of this injection frenzy is being buried as deep as possible by them. Trust the science? No, we should always question the science first. There has been too much trust and not enough scepticism.
I'm glad you mentioned that the aetiology is multifactorial and that obesity is a risk factor. When will we stop treating dietary guidelines as sacred scripture that can't be challenged? Years before COVID 19, doctors who questioned the high level of refined carbohydrate officially recommended, were persecuted and even dragged before the courts. We don't understand biochemistry and metabolism. We just keep repeating mantras like 'five a day' and 'saturated (i.e animal) fat is unhealthy'. We ignore the people who could have given us better understanding, but change is on the way, and it's a bottom up change.
We are governed by numpties.
The British Government's attempt to address the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in 2020 will eventually be seen in as both extraordinarily inept and amazingly successful. Overall it appears to have caused a significant move of wealth (and undermined the health) in our population.
The media handling of the governent's message was brilliant, with frightening images from China and Italy followed by tentatively introduced personal restrictions, which were gradually increased, the use of masks to spread fear in the population, and the message that only the bad or stupid failed to comply with their Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).
However, if the purpose of these NPIs was to stop the spread of the virus and limit its consequences, they were an abject failure. The IFR was exaggerated, PCR testing mismanaged, quarenteen misused and face covering useless.
The whole thing was unimaginably wasteful. On average, it was the equivalent of a £15,000 gift from government to each UK adult.
Most average people will be paying for this disaster for the rest of their lives. But according to Gary Stevenson (an ex financial trader), a small group of the very rich will accumulate this currency causing wealth inequality to exploded. Much of this new wealth will be spent on acquiring tangible assets and provoke yet another increase in their prices. Average houses will become to expensive for the average person to acquire.
The question in my mind is, was this a terrible "cock up" by the naive and overpromoted who were scared fools goaded on by the greedy; or some kind of ill-conceived conspiracy by shadowy governmental or multinational actors.
I find it more comforting to believe the second option because I prefer to hold on to the belief our authorities are competent even if their motives are questionable. The trouble is though the "cock-up" theory of history is nearly always correct.