Out of my 2700 patients I had one Covid death, a 91 year-old the details of whose hospital care I do not know. I am perplexed by the ongoing promotion of Covid vaccine to virtually the entire population six months and older here in British Columbia.
Regulators don't need direct corroborative evidence to give EUAs. The cabal had/has no intention of yielding to contraindicating evidence. Regardless of the mountains of adverse events accruing since 2020, the hundreds of side effects found on Pfizer' website during the rollouts, multiple disclaimers on the websites about safety and efficacy, reports of DNA contamination, lack of longterm trials evidencing safety, unblinding during trials, outrageous death counts that should have black- labeled the dope eons ago, clearly dangerous injections for pregnant women, and young women of all stripes, Increased AEs and cancers in Korea and Japan et cetera ad nauseam .... these criminals are still producing and promoting this shit and it is essentially OTC... and with no informed consent. Criminals are now OPENLY LAWLESS
SHAME on cooperative PHARMACIES, DOCTORS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES and the JUDICIARY and ANY CONFORMISTS APPLYING SOCIAL SANCTIONS and COERCION to the innocent unconvinced.
So, one death from COVID, and one death where COVID was contributary, in the placebo arm. To understand this in context we need to know how many trial participants there were. A quick internet search suggests around 42,000. Is that correct? Which further suggests that there were one - perhaps two - deaths in 21,000. A maximum risk of one in 10,000. Doesn't sound much for a "pandemic" where government over-reaction shut down the schools; put lives on hold and everybody under house arrest for the best part of 2 years; let the elderly die while denying them the love of family and friends; added 3 million to the NHS waiting list and getting on for half a trillion to the national debt.
You are absolutely right re the numbers so even if the cases they claimed in the NEJM of only 2 covid deaths with placebo and 1 with vaccine were correct, that would involve 21,000 needed to vaccinate to prevent one death. And this was the vaccine that apparently allowed us all to get back to normal!!
For children, I seem to recall that the number needed to vaccinate was around 250,000. Has there ever been a new and experimental medical product that is so well tolerated, it doesn't cause at least that number of adverse reactions? How could this 'vaccine' ever have been passed as suitable for the use of anyone under the age of 70?
So it's okay to inject over seventies with a cocktail which has negative efficacy against COVID, can turn cells indefinitely into spike protein factories and is contaminated with SV40-containing-DNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles?
Seems to me that a positive PCR and symptoms of a viral resp tract infection qualified the patient for a DNR and end of life protocol. So the PCR was the discriminator.
The RAT and PCR tests were intentionally misused to furnish a positive 'test' that was required to establish a fraudulent diagnosis of "COVID" from a collection of entirely non-specific, ubiquitous, clinical symptoms (WHO def.) that were used as a administrative marker for DNR.
The even bigger scam is that Pfizer changed the process between the trials and the rollout, with lots of DNA contamination in the general roll out. So, quite apart from the fact that the modRNA vaccine caused vital tissues like your heart to generate spike which then caused your immune system to kill heart cells, the presence of the SV40 promoter and likely also large portions of the plasmid will lead to an ongoing elevated death toll larger than occurred with the Polio vaccine:
PubSmear fabricates data in effort to retract DNA contam paper
"This is a clear example of the healthy vaccinee effect leaving the dying in the unvaccinated group."
I don't understand how this is an example of the healthy vaccinee effect leaving the dying in the unvaccinated group. Can you explain further? Did they match participants according to their health? Did they check serum D3 levels of participants?
Since the "vaccines" weren't regular pharmaceutical products but procured under special contracts between the likes of Pfizer & Moderna and the US military/DoD/DARPA and BARDA, the trials such as they were weren't legally required and were simply window dressing largely for the "benefit" of the public.
Yes, give Sasha Latypova 👏 credit for connecting the dots in her substack .
Give USA legal analyst Katherine Watt credit for researching how today's vaxxine killbox was legally constructed via laws and some court decisions over the past 130 years in her substack.
Be sure to watch new documentary 'An Inconvenient Study ' released oct 10th on TheHighwire.com for more information which shows that the unvaccinated children are healthy in many different areas than the vaccinated .
There is no regulatory oversight in the USA, see whistleblower Iambrookjackson.com who lost her lawsuit when the PreP Act of 2006 was used to dismiss her claims that the covid testing was fraudulent.
The CDC and FDA are well funded by big pharmaceutical so these agencies have always promoted pro vaccine agenda. RFK had his hands tied to a point.
"Would people still be as convinced as some are that they were ‘saved’ by a vaccine rollout?"
As all individuals in receipt of an synthetic gene/LNP injection were neither capable of fully informed consent nor furnished with information adequate to furnish fully informed consent, any supposition that anything would have been different remains the epitome of hand wavingly moot.
Out of my 2700 patients I had one Covid death, a 91 year-old the details of whose hospital care I do not know. I am perplexed by the ongoing promotion of Covid vaccine to virtually the entire population six months and older here in British Columbia.
Seriously, a single COVID death, on the basis of what, a +ve RAT or RT-PCR?
The WHO definition and diagnosis of the condition is predicated on such a 'test'.
Interesting.
...and the gold standard?
No properly identified, contagious pathogenic obligate self-replicating intracellular parasite.
That remains a country-mile from the phantasmagorical illusion of an in silico virtual 'construct' used to furnish the bioweaponry of a shot.
What about that ridiculous pantomime of "dying with Covid" and "dying of Covid" ?
Regulators don't need direct corroborative evidence to give EUAs. The cabal had/has no intention of yielding to contraindicating evidence. Regardless of the mountains of adverse events accruing since 2020, the hundreds of side effects found on Pfizer' website during the rollouts, multiple disclaimers on the websites about safety and efficacy, reports of DNA contamination, lack of longterm trials evidencing safety, unblinding during trials, outrageous death counts that should have black- labeled the dope eons ago, clearly dangerous injections for pregnant women, and young women of all stripes, Increased AEs and cancers in Korea and Japan et cetera ad nauseam .... these criminals are still producing and promoting this shit and it is essentially OTC... and with no informed consent. Criminals are now OPENLY LAWLESS
SHAME on cooperative PHARMACIES, DOCTORS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES and the JUDICIARY and ANY CONFORMISTS APPLYING SOCIAL SANCTIONS and COERCION to the innocent unconvinced.
So, one death from COVID, and one death where COVID was contributary, in the placebo arm. To understand this in context we need to know how many trial participants there were. A quick internet search suggests around 42,000. Is that correct? Which further suggests that there were one - perhaps two - deaths in 21,000. A maximum risk of one in 10,000. Doesn't sound much for a "pandemic" where government over-reaction shut down the schools; put lives on hold and everybody under house arrest for the best part of 2 years; let the elderly die while denying them the love of family and friends; added 3 million to the NHS waiting list and getting on for half a trillion to the national debt.
You are absolutely right re the numbers so even if the cases they claimed in the NEJM of only 2 covid deaths with placebo and 1 with vaccine were correct, that would involve 21,000 needed to vaccinate to prevent one death. And this was the vaccine that apparently allowed us all to get back to normal!!
For children, I seem to recall that the number needed to vaccinate was around 250,000. Has there ever been a new and experimental medical product that is so well tolerated, it doesn't cause at least that number of adverse reactions? How could this 'vaccine' ever have been passed as suitable for the use of anyone under the age of 70?
So it's okay to inject over seventies with a cocktail which has negative efficacy against COVID, can turn cells indefinitely into spike protein factories and is contaminated with SV40-containing-DNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles?
Absolutely, especially given mortality rate for healthy children of around 1 in 2 million in UK
Seems to me that a positive PCR and symptoms of a viral resp tract infection qualified the patient for a DNR and end of life protocol. So the PCR was the discriminator.
'So the PCR was the discriminator'
The RAT and PCR tests were intentionally misused to furnish a positive 'test' that was required to establish a fraudulent diagnosis of "COVID" from a collection of entirely non-specific, ubiquitous, clinical symptoms (WHO def.) that were used as a administrative marker for DNR.
The lethal circularity appears self-evident.
The even bigger scam is that Pfizer changed the process between the trials and the rollout, with lots of DNA contamination in the general roll out. So, quite apart from the fact that the modRNA vaccine caused vital tissues like your heart to generate spike which then caused your immune system to kill heart cells, the presence of the SV40 promoter and likely also large portions of the plasmid will lead to an ongoing elevated death toll larger than occurred with the Polio vaccine:
PubSmear fabricates data in effort to retract DNA contam paper
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/pubsmear-fabricates-data-in-effort
Pfizer's failure to linearize the plasmids
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/pfizers-failure-to-linearize-the
And much more.
About participant 4 after unblinding you say"
"This is a clear example of the healthy vaccinee effect leaving the dying in the unvaccinated group."
I don't understand how this is an example of the healthy vaccinee effect leaving the dying in the unvaccinated group. Can you explain further? Did they match participants according to their health? Did they check serum D3 levels of participants?
Since the "vaccines" weren't regular pharmaceutical products but procured under special contracts between the likes of Pfizer & Moderna and the US military/DoD/DARPA and BARDA, the trials such as they were weren't legally required and were simply window dressing largely for the "benefit" of the public.
Yes, give Sasha Latypova 👏 credit for connecting the dots in her substack .
Give USA legal analyst Katherine Watt credit for researching how today's vaxxine killbox was legally constructed via laws and some court decisions over the past 130 years in her substack.
The lack of rigorous regulatory scrutiny is shocking.
Be sure to watch new documentary 'An Inconvenient Study ' released oct 10th on TheHighwire.com for more information which shows that the unvaccinated children are healthy in many different areas than the vaccinated .
https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/
There is no regulatory oversight in the USA, see whistleblower Iambrookjackson.com who lost her lawsuit when the PreP Act of 2006 was used to dismiss her claims that the covid testing was fraudulent.
The CDC and FDA are well funded by big pharmaceutical so these agencies have always promoted pro vaccine agenda. RFK had his hands tied to a point.
Excellent work—it was a deliberate scam right from the beginning. Some should be made accountable...
"Would people still be as convinced as some are that they were ‘saved’ by a vaccine rollout?"
As all individuals in receipt of an synthetic gene/LNP injection were neither capable of fully informed consent nor furnished with information adequate to furnish fully informed consent, any supposition that anything would have been different remains the epitome of hand wavingly moot.