Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stuffysays's avatar

most of the people I know still queue up for their seasonal boosters, still believe the jabs have saved millions of lives, still keep a mask handy in case they develop a cold in front of a vulnerable person. They don't want to talk about the last few years - it really is a topic that gets immediately closed down - so I suspect they know they were played in some way but they still think what happened was a biblical plague so deadly the restrictions were the only way to survive. Mind you, they all also think Trump is mad and dangerous and Kennedy is anti-science so they won't believe anything good of whatever they manage to do. Here in the UK the public needs the BBC to hold a conference with Chris Whitty and the other Doomsters to tell them it's all over and it was a terrible mistake and lessons will be learnt and there is nothing to fear anymore. Because nobody has actually said that in the mainstream media or in government or in the NHS.

Expand full comment
john robinson's avatar

Regulatory capture is by far the most insidious, malignant force effecting public policy and law enforcement in the U.S.. It's not only infecting institutions whose concern should be public health such as the HHS, CDC, NIH and FDA but is also rampant in more important, pervasive and influential structures such as the Department of Justice. The DOJ runs what appears to be essentially a protection racket for all large corporations in general and for Big Pharma in particular. When a company such as Pfizer or Moderna or J&J or Bayer run afoul of the law, DOJ presses charges, gets essentially a Nolo Contendere and the company pays a fine without having to admit guilt. Executives get a pass and the cost is born by the stockholder. No one goes to jail, no one individual is fined and business continues as usual. Furthermore, the dirty doctors who accept bribes are not named, so these pushers keep their drugs/vaccines on the streets ( in the clinics)with their patients being none the wiser. Moreover the SEC looks the other way when it comes to enforcing corporate malfeasance. And, we might as well erase the dictionary entry for "transparency" (in government). For instance, what do our so called "representative's" offshore bank accounts look like? One might ask; how frequently do we hear the phrase "quid pro quo" uttered in the main steam media? Compared to the actual rate of occurrence of such phenomena?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts