The covid operation was planned and run by the US military. This has been ascertained in court. Stop discussing misdirections HART.
Answers in court
A. The distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits.
Q. But you're relying on what the manufacturer is telling you about what they did in the manufacturing process because you don't have people on the ground at Moderna, right?
A. No, we did have people in plant.
Q. Military people?
A. Correct.
Disbrow also testified to the presence of Department of Defense personnel in the facilities of all six of the vaccine manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted. And then the discussion amongst the attorneys and the judge (in-court document 335) regarding a document redacted by the DOJ showed what was the real worry:
Attorney: It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military... these are military contracts. Which is one of the reasons they want this confidential, because I don’t think they want people to know that, for whatever reason, … I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it.
Advanced Technology International is involved in “WMD Countermeasures”. The entire Covid-19 operation (see all the contracts here, reaching back to 2018) has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents. While the medical system believed the CDC and the FDA, the CDC and FDA were following military orders, and the whole project had nothing to do with science.
I cannot buy into this long distance spread narrative. I recall the chief medical officer of china stating early on that they never isolated this virus. So, what was it other than a genomic made up guess which was used to create a pathogenic genetic therapy and theraputic regime administered with devastating results. Call it what you want eugenics, transhumanism or depopulation but it is still an attack on humanity.
Fair comment, but whether it was a genomic invention or a mislabelled flu virus or even a genuine coronavirus, the overwhelming evidence is that the risks were exaggerated, the fear propaganda profound and the response catastrophic. However you look at it, shutting residents in their care homes with no visitors to die of loneliness and dehydration and then label the deaths as Covid with no access to standard care just end of life drugs, played totally into the fear and hence the rush for a vaccine, using a technology that had been waiting for a cause!
Well said Ros. Let's say another lockdown tomorrow. Same rules as 2020 but WITHOUT any new 'COVID' what would happen to death rates particulalrly in the most frail? That wouldn't be called a pandemic.
‘By April 2020, Scottish Care was starting to hear from in its members that the three main diagnostic symptoms of COVID-19 (continuous cough, high temperature and a fever) were not illustrative of how COVID-19 was presenting in older people.’’
-Dr.Donald Macaskill, Chief Executive, Scottish Care. Paragraph 27 of statement
Couple this with NO 'testing' for advertised novel pathogen as the most frail were treated like 'dogs in quarantine' (direct quote) apparently this is proof of a pandemic. Extraordinary!
''The totalitarian and brutal public ‘health’ measures which REMOVED crucial life support systems more specific to the most vulnerable with dementia and disabilities.''
Mr. Donaldson was far too lenient in describing the NHS responses to any aspect of the COV2 pseudo emergency when instead of using the adjectives reckless, irresponsible, deliberate or intentionally harmful he uses the nouns error and failure. Imposed COV2 restrictions across all demographics were/are neither errors nor failures. The rulers had their underlings purposely and calculatingly do harm to the world population in myriad ways; not just attacking the elderly. Measured in effective social disruption, as intended, policies were/are a success. Donaldson’s use of such mild terminology lets the rulers off the hook so that they can continue to do damage without suffering the legal and social consequences of their crimes. They knew/know exactly what they were/are doing. As did/ do the nurses and MDs who perpetrate (d) the crimes.
I agree it's almost impossible to call what happened as a mistake as it went on for far too long. The harms from the restrictions by April 2020 were already know with calls for remedial action ignored. These people died the most 'involving COVID.''
In terms of the amyloid clots, the micro-clots that block arteries and small blood vessels can cause silent hypoxia or organ dysfunction in, for example, the brain, kidney, or heart without an obvious thrombosis being detected. In terms of the white fibrous clots/macro-clots, these can cause obvious strokes and heart attacks.
In terms of prion diseases, neurovascular or neurodegenerative disorders may arise, and do so more quickly than the decades that it usually takes for these disorders to manifest. For example, neurovascular disorders such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), brain fog, tremors, and behavioral changes may arise in younger people. And more serious neurodegenerative disorders such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, Parkinson’ disease, and Alzheimer’s-like dementia can occur in younger people as well.
A note on ''Anne's Law'' it was recently stated (see below) you will STILL NOT BE PERMITTED access to see a loved one in another panic-demic and now even non panic-demic situations! This has been facilitated by Care Home Relatives Scotland who blocked me early on in my Twitter postings about the Scottish inquiry. The Law Society of Scotland made in clear in their consultation the right to visit is ALREADY protected under article 8 of the ECHR which many in the 'political opposition' like Farage want the UK out of. The ECHR would be obstacle is another panic-demic.
This is a very disturbing read as it documents events from 2020/1 and the atrocities committed against old people, but also some younger people too, principally in care homes but also by the wider health service, supposedly “for their safety”.
I can only thank God for the humanity shown to Dagmar’s Mum (RIP) in her care home in Chislehurst and that my parents (both RIP now too) were not so bad at the time that they could be cared for at home, (though my Dad was still to die when my brother’s request for my parents to not have a booster covid “vaccine” was ignored (by then Dad was diagnosed as not having capacity)). He collapsed four days after the shot.
It is by the excellent Clare Craig from Hart, who have from the off done tirelessly great works.
Sadly, all this work and the personal testimonies they collated were not accepted by our still running government covid inquiry.
Read it and weep and I hope raise your own voice to ensure these testimonies are acknowledged and that as a society we never have to go through this again.
Thanks you Ms Craig and all at Hart from the bottom of my heart
This is a very disturbing read as it documents events from 2020/1 and the atrocities committed against old people, but also some younger people too, principally in care homes but also by the wider health service, supposedly “for their safety”.
I can only thank God for the humanity shown to my wife's Dagmar’s Mum (RIP) in her care home in Chislehurst and that my parents (both RIP now too) were not so bad at the time that they could be cared for at home, (though my Dad was still to die when my brother’s request for my parents to not have a booster covid “vaccine” was ignored (by then Dad was diagnosed as not having capacity)). He collapsed four days after the shot.
I see it is by the excellent Clare Craig from the Hart Group, who have from the off done tirelessly great works.
Sadly, all this work and the personal testimonies they collated were not accepted by our still running government covid inquiry.
Read it and weep and I hope raise your own voice to ensure these testimonies are acknowledged and that as a society we never have to go through this again.
Quote from The Natural Vet. This development is concerning please read the second letter.
"Back in July 2023, I along with 3 co-signatories submitted an Open Letter of Concern regarding the intended use of the mRNA platform in animals. Link to read it and the response I received back is in Links at the end.
Since the original mRNA products were given emergency authorisation there has been further development of the RNA idea to include self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), where the body manufactures the mRNA element in situ which goes on to direct protein manufacture, and lately, trans-amplifying RNA (taRNA) which consist of two separate, shorter RNA fragments - one encoding the antigen and one encoding the replicase.
It has recently been brought to my attention that there is now a Memorandum of Understanding for collaboration between the Centre for Veterinary Vaccine Innovation and Manufacture (CVIM) based at the Government research site at Pirbright and CPI who are a private company based in the UK. The have declared their intention to initially develop RNA veterinary vaccines for livestock.
I and 10 co-signatories (so far) have therefore submitted a further Open Letter of Concern 2. The link to the online publication is in the Links.
Whilst this might appear to be just a UK issue on the face of it, it signifies that there is intention to move this dangerous RNA platform (mRNA, saRNA and taRNA jabs) into the veterinary realm for use
....The evidence emerging from the USA as shown in the 2 graphs below, is beyond concerning in that there would appear to be epigenetic risks from females being administered the mRNA platform during pregnancy. The increase in deaths in the 0-4 year old age range amongst individuals who were not vaccinated and did not contract COVID, but whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy has huge implications for using the mRNA platform in the livestock industry that relies totally on successful breeding to maintain numbers and thus our food supply. in livestock on a wider scale."
It's remarkable to me in 2025 given the mountains of confirmed extreme policy harms and lack of proof of novel viral harms (particularly March-May 2020 in care homes) we still have so many medical people 'speaking out' not willing to admit what should be obvious and which is NOT without precedent. eg-See swine flu scandal.
''Some medical experts doubt whether this was really a pandemic at all.’’
''The official evidence presented at the inquiry under oath and within statements when forensically examined is compelling significant numbers of people died, particularly the elderly with Dementia in care homes March-May 2020 sorely due to the inhumane protocols put in place and not any novel pathogen where the facts confirm in almost all cases ‘COVID-19’ was recorded on a suspected or probable basis without any physical in person GP assessment or confirmatory’ testing.''
The discussion on what went on during the covid emergency can only take place within certain controlled parameters. Good luck with moving the discussion onto the true effects and goals.
https://utahhealth.substack.com/p/utah-ground-zero-for-the-health-freedom
The covid operation was planned and run by the US military. This has been ascertained in court. Stop discussing misdirections HART.
Answers in court
A. The distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits.
Q. But you're relying on what the manufacturer is telling you about what they did in the manufacturing process because you don't have people on the ground at Moderna, right?
A. No, we did have people in plant.
Q. Military people?
A. Correct.
Disbrow also testified to the presence of Department of Defense personnel in the facilities of all six of the vaccine manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted. And then the discussion amongst the attorneys and the judge (in-court document 335) regarding a document redacted by the DOJ showed what was the real worry:
Attorney: It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military... these are military contracts. Which is one of the reasons they want this confidential, because I don’t think they want people to know that, for whatever reason, … I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it.
Advanced Technology International is involved in “WMD Countermeasures”. The entire Covid-19 operation (see all the contracts here, reaching back to 2018) has hence been under military command, from the creation of the problem to the war-like ‘solution’ with vaccine ‘weapons’ against all residents. While the medical system believed the CDC and the FDA, the CDC and FDA were following military orders, and the whole project had nothing to do with science.
I cannot buy into this long distance spread narrative. I recall the chief medical officer of china stating early on that they never isolated this virus. So, what was it other than a genomic made up guess which was used to create a pathogenic genetic therapy and theraputic regime administered with devastating results. Call it what you want eugenics, transhumanism or depopulation but it is still an attack on humanity.
Fair comment, but whether it was a genomic invention or a mislabelled flu virus or even a genuine coronavirus, the overwhelming evidence is that the risks were exaggerated, the fear propaganda profound and the response catastrophic. However you look at it, shutting residents in their care homes with no visitors to die of loneliness and dehydration and then label the deaths as Covid with no access to standard care just end of life drugs, played totally into the fear and hence the rush for a vaccine, using a technology that had been waiting for a cause!
Well said Ros. Let's say another lockdown tomorrow. Same rules as 2020 but WITHOUT any new 'COVID' what would happen to death rates particulalrly in the most frail? That wouldn't be called a pandemic.
‘By April 2020, Scottish Care was starting to hear from in its members that the three main diagnostic symptoms of COVID-19 (continuous cough, high temperature and a fever) were not illustrative of how COVID-19 was presenting in older people.’’
-Dr.Donald Macaskill, Chief Executive, Scottish Care. Paragraph 27 of statement
Couple this with NO 'testing' for advertised novel pathogen as the most frail were treated like 'dogs in quarantine' (direct quote) apparently this is proof of a pandemic. Extraordinary!
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-38d?utm_source=publication-search
''an attack on humanity.''
''The totalitarian and brutal public ‘health’ measures which REMOVED crucial life support systems more specific to the most vulnerable with dementia and disabilities.''
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusiveuk-covid-19-inquiry-ultimate-38f
PS death certification without attendance/ examination. Only one diagnosis
Mr. Donaldson was far too lenient in describing the NHS responses to any aspect of the COV2 pseudo emergency when instead of using the adjectives reckless, irresponsible, deliberate or intentionally harmful he uses the nouns error and failure. Imposed COV2 restrictions across all demographics were/are neither errors nor failures. The rulers had their underlings purposely and calculatingly do harm to the world population in myriad ways; not just attacking the elderly. Measured in effective social disruption, as intended, policies were/are a success. Donaldson’s use of such mild terminology lets the rulers off the hook so that they can continue to do damage without suffering the legal and social consequences of their crimes. They knew/know exactly what they were/are doing. As did/ do the nurses and MDs who perpetrate (d) the crimes.
I agree it's almost impossible to call what happened as a mistake as it went on for far too long. The harms from the restrictions by April 2020 were already know with calls for remedial action ignored. These people died the most 'involving COVID.''
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-38d?utm_source=publication-search
Just want to say goodbye! I'm unsubscribing because Hart haven't replied to 2 messages I've sent in past month or so.
Communication should be 2-way, not 1. Bye!
Hi Dr, Danny what are your thoughts on the Scottish inquiry?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
So sorry. Where were the messages? We don’t really have a system for replying - no staff!
What do you know about the White embalmer's clots HART?
These ones.
https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/a-horrifying-breakthrough-in-the
In terms of the amyloid clots, the micro-clots that block arteries and small blood vessels can cause silent hypoxia or organ dysfunction in, for example, the brain, kidney, or heart without an obvious thrombosis being detected. In terms of the white fibrous clots/macro-clots, these can cause obvious strokes and heart attacks.
In terms of prion diseases, neurovascular or neurodegenerative disorders may arise, and do so more quickly than the decades that it usually takes for these disorders to manifest. For example, neurovascular disorders such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), brain fog, tremors, and behavioral changes may arise in younger people. And more serious neurodegenerative disorders such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, Parkinson’ disease, and Alzheimer’s-like dementia can occur in younger people as well.
A note on ''Anne's Law'' it was recently stated (see below) you will STILL NOT BE PERMITTED access to see a loved one in another panic-demic and now even non panic-demic situations! This has been facilitated by Care Home Relatives Scotland who blocked me early on in my Twitter postings about the Scottish inquiry. The Law Society of Scotland made in clear in their consultation the right to visit is ALREADY protected under article 8 of the ECHR which many in the 'political opposition' like Farage want the UK out of. The ECHR would be obstacle is another panic-demic.
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-137749129
Are the care homes 'collateral damage', like so much else to do with the WEF''s way of doing things..?
This is a very disturbing read as it documents events from 2020/1 and the atrocities committed against old people, but also some younger people too, principally in care homes but also by the wider health service, supposedly “for their safety”.
I can only thank God for the humanity shown to Dagmar’s Mum (RIP) in her care home in Chislehurst and that my parents (both RIP now too) were not so bad at the time that they could be cared for at home, (though my Dad was still to die when my brother’s request for my parents to not have a booster covid “vaccine” was ignored (by then Dad was diagnosed as not having capacity)). He collapsed four days after the shot.
It is by the excellent Clare Craig from Hart, who have from the off done tirelessly great works.
Sadly, all this work and the personal testimonies they collated were not accepted by our still running government covid inquiry.
Read it and weep and I hope raise your own voice to ensure these testimonies are acknowledged and that as a society we never have to go through this again.
Thanks you Ms Craig and all at Hart from the bottom of my heart
This is a very disturbing read as it documents events from 2020/1 and the atrocities committed against old people, but also some younger people too, principally in care homes but also by the wider health service, supposedly “for their safety”.
I can only thank God for the humanity shown to my wife's Dagmar’s Mum (RIP) in her care home in Chislehurst and that my parents (both RIP now too) were not so bad at the time that they could be cared for at home, (though my Dad was still to die when my brother’s request for my parents to not have a booster covid “vaccine” was ignored (by then Dad was diagnosed as not having capacity)). He collapsed four days after the shot.
I see it is by the excellent Clare Craig from the Hart Group, who have from the off done tirelessly great works.
Sadly, all this work and the personal testimonies they collated were not accepted by our still running government covid inquiry.
Read it and weep and I hope raise your own voice to ensure these testimonies are acknowledged and that as a society we never have to go through this again.
Thank you Ms. Craig and all at Hart.
Quote from The Natural Vet. This development is concerning please read the second letter.
"Back in July 2023, I along with 3 co-signatories submitted an Open Letter of Concern regarding the intended use of the mRNA platform in animals. Link to read it and the response I received back is in Links at the end.
https://naturalvet.substack.com/p/open-letter-of-concern-2
Since the original mRNA products were given emergency authorisation there has been further development of the RNA idea to include self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), where the body manufactures the mRNA element in situ which goes on to direct protein manufacture, and lately, trans-amplifying RNA (taRNA) which consist of two separate, shorter RNA fragments - one encoding the antigen and one encoding the replicase.
It has recently been brought to my attention that there is now a Memorandum of Understanding for collaboration between the Centre for Veterinary Vaccine Innovation and Manufacture (CVIM) based at the Government research site at Pirbright and CPI who are a private company based in the UK. The have declared their intention to initially develop RNA veterinary vaccines for livestock.
I and 10 co-signatories (so far) have therefore submitted a further Open Letter of Concern 2. The link to the online publication is in the Links.
Whilst this might appear to be just a UK issue on the face of it, it signifies that there is intention to move this dangerous RNA platform (mRNA, saRNA and taRNA jabs) into the veterinary realm for use
....The evidence emerging from the USA as shown in the 2 graphs below, is beyond concerning in that there would appear to be epigenetic risks from females being administered the mRNA platform during pregnancy. The increase in deaths in the 0-4 year old age range amongst individuals who were not vaccinated and did not contract COVID, but whose mothers were vaccinated during pregnancy has huge implications for using the mRNA platform in the livestock industry that relies totally on successful breeding to maintain numbers and thus our food supply. in livestock on a wider scale."
It's remarkable to me in 2025 given the mountains of confirmed extreme policy harms and lack of proof of novel viral harms (particularly March-May 2020 in care homes) we still have so many medical people 'speaking out' not willing to admit what should be obvious and which is NOT without precedent. eg-See swine flu scandal.
''Some medical experts doubt whether this was really a pandemic at all.’’
-BBC 20th May 2010- https://www.bbc.com/news/10128604
''The official evidence presented at the inquiry under oath and within statements when forensically examined is compelling significant numbers of people died, particularly the elderly with Dementia in care homes March-May 2020 sorely due to the inhumane protocols put in place and not any novel pathogen where the facts confirm in almost all cases ‘COVID-19’ was recorded on a suspected or probable basis without any physical in person GP assessment or confirmatory’ testing.''
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newwhat-happened-in-scottish-care
The discussion on what went on during the covid emergency can only take place within certain controlled parameters. Good luck with moving the discussion onto the true effects and goals.
It's all there. All that is needed to prevent a recurrence
Assumed diagnoses, and only one diagnosis proferred
E consult doctors, if lucky
Treatment pathways , one only and that end of life
Use of drugs only appropriate for ending life.
Denial of antibiotics
Humanity and ethics abandoned.